Rethinking Enterprise AI with Fujitsu and Cohere: Private. Powerful. Purpose-Built

Fujitsu / September 10, 2025

Generative AI is no longer a curious experiment at the enterprise level. Executives see its power to streamline operations, surface hidden insights, and spark new revenue ideas. More than 90% of pioneering organizations# surveyed by Fujitsu plan to use generative AI to support operations and automate routine tasks within the next year. Over 60% of business leaders also think# that the increased use of AI will contribute to the success of both Digital and Sustainability Transformation. Yet many transformation programs stall just after the proof-of-concept stage. Concerns over data privacy, the complexity of integrating unfamiliar tools, and the difficulty of proving ROI keep ambitious projects on the sidelines. This blog covers some of the common pitfalls that business leaders embarking on GenAI implementation projects should be wary of, with recommendations on how to avoid them.

# https://global.fujitsu/en-global/about/vision/leadership-challenges/sustainability-transformation-survey-2024

Why the Vision Stalls

In most organizations, sensitive data lives behind strict firewalls, while AI models are typically trained far beyond enterprise borders. This disconnect creates real concerns. Leaders rightly worry about exposing proprietary information or infringing third-party IP. Even when those risks are addressed, grafting a new technology stack onto established CRM, ERP or service-management workflows can feel like open-heart surgery—complex, costly and disruptive. More often than not, successful technology demonstration of PoCs (proof-of-concepts) falter in the transition to real-world deployment due to practical difficulties with integration, scalability, and security.
Furthermore, GenAI amplifies existing ethical risks such as inherent biases in training data, not to mention their ability to hallucinate – which makes it easier to exploit vulnerabilities and spread misinformation or carry out targeted attacks. As a result, executives struggle to link AI investments to measurable gains in customer experience, efficiency or compliance.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

A clear path to addressing data and IP sovereignty is to develop customized LLMs (large language models), that exploit the the organization’s proprietary data, and hosted on private or hybrid-cloud deployments, rather than leverage the publicly hosted equivalents. Customization or fine-tuning is the process of taking a pre-trained base model and further training on a smaller, task-specific dataset to adapt it to a particular domain, use case, or organization’s unique needs. However, this results in a trade-off – private deployments require the models to have a smaller footprint, which typically results in reduced accuracy.
Manual and customized integration between fine-tuned LLMs and the existing technology stack is risky, time-consuming, and prone to future problems. Leveraging pre-built connectors makes this process less error-prone and predictable.
Security is an extremely important variable to focus on at the strategic level, much before implementation planning. Being aware of potential risks is necessary to securing your LLMs. It is fundamentally imperative to deploy anti-hallucination techniques, leverage Retrieval-Augmented-Generation (RAG) to keep the LLM grounded in its source training data, as well as implement methods that can detect, and subsequently prevent, bias, vulnerabilities, and security threats.
It may be painfully obvious, but all of this must be done in a way that doesn’t undermine the business case or worsen the ROI from deploying Generative AI. Proper project management, change management, and adequate training are necessary to avoid such common pitfalls that are inevitable in such transformative journeys.

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...