Home
AI
AI Sovereignty: Moving beyond myths to true Strategic Autonomy

AI Sovereignty: Moving beyond myths to true Strategic Autonomy

Fujitsu / March 26, 2026

AI is rapidly moving from the experimental phase to becoming a mission-critical component of organizations worldwide. As its influence grows, so does the strategic importance of AI Sovereignty - the ability for governments and enterprises to control the AI that controls their business. In fact, according to IDC, by 2028, 60% of multinational firms will split AI stacks across sovereign zones.1 Yet, this crucial concept is often misunderstood, leading to unnecessary apprehension about whether it’s even possible in a connected global supply chain. It's time to set the record straight and debunk some common myths surrounding AI Sovereignty.

1 Source: IDC FutureScape: Worldwide AI-Fueled Business Strategies 2026 Predictions (# US53864825)

Why AI Sovereignty matters now
Myth 1: “We need to train our own foundation AI models from scratch.”
Myth 2: “Sovereignty means isolation from global innovation.”
Myth 3: “We must own the entire AI tech stack.”
Myth 4: “Open source models are free of third-party rights.”
From Myths to Practical Strategic Autonomy

Why AI Sovereignty matters now

The stakes of AI deployment have moved beyond simple privacy concerns to fundamental questions of strategic dependence. Imagine a geopolitical event disrupting access to the AI services underpinning your operations, or sensitive IP leaking through public models due to prompt injections, or facing compliance suits based on extraterritorial laws. Boards globally are now recognizing that placing critical workflows entirely on AI models governed by other jurisdictions presents unacceptable risks. Regulatory pressures, especially in Europe with GDPR and the EU AI Act, further accelerate this shift, pushing organizations towards greater control over their AI systems. This is why we're seeing a recent spike in interest in sovereign AI, to ensure AI aligns with an organization’s specific trust boundaries and compliance needs. While the concept of AI Sovereignty can seem daunting, often conjuring images of building vast, isolated tech empires from scratch, leaders are often wrong about their assumptions about what is actually needed for AI Sovereignty. Four myths, in particular, stand out and cause unnecessary hesitation for leaders looking to secure their operations.

Myth 1: “We need to train our own foundation AI models from scratch.”

This is perhaps the most pervasive misconception. The reality is that creating cutting-edge foundation models is prohibitively expensive and complex for all but a handful of global tech giants.

The Truth: Real sovereignty leverage lies not in model creation, but in where and how you run AI model inferencing against your data. By deploying powerful third-party or open-source models inside your own secure infrastructure, you gain full control over AI inference, data governance, and data flows, all without the immense cost of pre-training everything yourself.

Myth 2: “Sovereignty means isolation from global innovation.”

Another common fear is that pursuing sovereignty requires cutting your organization off from the best global cloud and AI ecosystems, thereby stifling innovation.

The Truth: AI Sovereignty is not about isolation; it's about selective autonomy. You can strategically decide which workloads must run on sovereign infrastructure and which are acceptable for public services. This approach allows you to leverage powerful global tools while ensuring your most sensitive workloads remain within clearly defined trust boundaries.

Myth 3: “We must own the entire AI tech stack.”

In a globally interconnected supply chain, the idea of owning every component from the silicon chips to the software libraries seems completely unrealistic.

The Truth: Owning every component is neither necessary nor practical. True AI Sovereignty is about controlling the critical layers that shape your risk posture: your data, the location of AI inference, access controls, and governance frameworks. Hardening these key control points is far more effective than pursuing complete vertical ownership.

Myth 4: “Open source models are free of third-party rights.”

Another popular myth is that we can use any AI model, and if it is open source, it is free of third-party rights.

The truth: This is a risky misconception. Many models, including open-source ones, are trained on vast, unfiltered datasets that often include copyrighted material. Using them can expose your business to severe legal risks and intellectual property lawsuits from competitors or rights holders. Such legal consequences are already a reality. For example, on November 11, 2025, the Regional Court of Munich ruled in favor of the German music rights organization GEMA against OpenAI. The court confirmed that ChatGPT violated copyright laws by reproducing protected song lyrics, including those from Helene Fischer.

The solution: To protect yourself from such legal pitfalls, the choice of the model is crucial. LLMs from providers such as Cohere, for instance, are explicitly trained with curated, high-quality data that is verified to be free of copyright infringements. 2 Using such models shields customers from being sued over the intellectual property used in the training process.

2 https://cohere.com/blog/cohere-intellectual-property

From Myth to Practical Strategic Autonomy

AI Sovereignty should not be seen as a barrier locking you away from innovation. Instead, it is the strategic enabler that makes trusted, scaled AI adoption possible. By shifting the focus from building everything to controlling what matters, organizations can harness the best of global AI while reducing strategic dependencies.

At Fujitsu, we make this practical. Through our strategic partnership with Cohere, we enable customers to deploy world-class Large Language Models like Command A directly within their own secure environments. This “bring AI to the data” approach is exemplified by our Private GPT solution, which runs entirely in a customer's data center or private cloud. Furthermore, with models like Takane, a Fujitsu-fine-tuned model optimized for specific languages and cultures, we empower you to run advanced GenAI while ensuring your sensitive data never leaves your perimeter. Sovereignty isn't a myth; it's a capability we can help you build today for genuine strategic autonomy.

This article is part of the Fujitsu impact series, designed to help organizations navigate the real-world challenges of enterprise AI. The series brings together practical guidance from Fujitsu experts and IDC guest speakers to combine real-world execution experience and an independent market perspective. In the series, we explore the top challenges AI leaders are tackling today, from adoption and trust to agentic AI orchestration, sovereignty, security, and value realization, offering unique perspectives and insights to support informed decision-making. Start your journey here: https://mkt-europe.global.fujitsu.com/FujitsuImpactSeries

Mahesh Krishnan

CTO, Fujitsu Oceania

Mahesh is Chief Technology Officer (CTO) for Fujitsu Oceania, guiding organizations through AI driven transformation with a strong focus on sovereignty, sustainability, and ethics. He works with leaders to align AI investments with resilience, long term value, and responsible innovation.

Udo Würtz

CTO, European Platform Business, Fsas Technologies

Udo Würtz is Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Fsas Technologies, a Fujitsu company, and was appointed Fujitsu Fellow for his technological thought leadership. In his role, he advises the top management of leading companies on strategies, technologies and new trends in the IT business.

His technological focus is on artificial intelligence (especially generative AI), quantum computing, modern software-defined data centres and the use of IoT data in LLM models.