Think like a hacker: How to disrupt attack paths before they form

Fujitsu / April 30, 2025

Enterprise security teams often face a tidal wave of vulnerabilities, yet patching is typically owned by IT, not security. Even so, adversaries continue to find ways into business-critical systems. While some exposures are clearly severe, others may appear minor – such as overlooked cloud misconfigurations or stale credentials – but can still be chained together to devastating effect. Simply trying to “patch everything” is unsustainable and risks diverting attention away from issues that truly matter.

A more effective approach is to view your environment from an attacker’s perspective. Instead of focusing only on known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), consider how adversaries exploit identity weaknesses, unchecked permissions, and forgotten credentials to move laterally and reach high-value assets. This shift aligns with Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) – a five-step framework defined by Gartner to continuously identify, prioritize, and remediate security gaps. CTEM can be applied to any environment, helping teams mobilize remediation efforts efficiently rather than drowning in endless vulnerability lists.

Understanding how adversaries really operate

Many adversaries are opportunistic and will use anything available to them – ranging from known CVEs to overlooked credentials and stealthy “living off the land” binaries or scripts (often referred to as LOLBAS). This approach allows them to blend into legitimate network processes, avoid detection, and escalate privileges when needed.
Attackers typically chain smaller weaknesses – such as misconfigurations, unmonitored or leftover credentials, and security controls that remain disabled or were never enabled – to move toward their targets. Privilege escalation may be vertical, in which attackers gain higher-level access on the same system, or horizontal, where they move to a different system with similar privileges, depending on which path offers the best foothold. Because organizations often lack full visibility into these hidden gaps, adversaries can exploit them well before they show up in any CVE list.
By viewing your environment as adversaries do – looking for unprotected identity paths, weak internal configurations, and opportunities for stealth movement – you can better identify exposures that truly matter. This shift in perspective is essential to CTEM, where each gap is assessed in context. Instead of attempting to patch every single issue, CTEM directs you to the exposures that pose the highest risk first, maximizing the impact of your limited security resources.

Choke points vs. dead ends: focus on what matters

Many organizations discover tens of thousands of exposures across on-premises, cloud, and identity infrastructures. However, not all of these exposures enable adversaries to access critical systems. Some are effectively “dead ends,” providing no viable route to sensitive assets or data. Others converge on a single entity – referred to as a choke point – where remediating one endpoint can disrupt multiple potential attack paths at once.
Although only about 2% of exposures in a typical environment serve as choke points, remediating them can significantly reduce risk. For example, a single host might harbor multiple vulnerabilities that collectively allow lateral movement toward business-critical systems. Addressing these issues together on that one host is far more efficient than randomly patching unconnected exposures.
By identifying choke points, organizations can make the most of limited resources and avoid “patch everything” fatigue. Using the CTEM framework, defenders can assess the real impact of each discovered gap, ensuring that remediation focuses on the issues most likely to affect critical systems, rather than those that present little or no actual threat.

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...